Ford confirms small unibody pickup coming to US - Page 3
Username or Email Address
Do you already have an account?
Forgot your password?
  • Log in or Sign up

    Welcome to VWvortex - The Volkswagen Enthusiast Website.
    You're currently browsing VWvortex site as a guest. Please sign up or sign in and take part in the conversation. VWvortex has over 750,000+ registered users discussing a wide variety of Volkswagen related topics. Take a minute to sign up to enjoy all the features of VWvortex.
    The Car Lounge
    Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
    Results 51 to 66 of 66
    1. #51
      Senior Member bzcat's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 26th, 2001
      Location
      Los Angeles
      Posts
      24,659
      https://fordauthority.com/2020/07/up...of-camouflage/

      Article says it is wearing a fake butt to make it look bigger. Probably true... you can see about 7 or 8" of fake camo after the exhaust tip.






    2. Remove Advertisements

      Advertisements
       

    3. #52
      Member
      Join Date
      Apr 23rd, 2020
      Location
      Midwest
      Posts
      164
      it better be aluminum. F150 is the only truck I'd remotely consider since I live in the salt belt. Everything rots out in less than 10 years.

    4. #53
      Member Unilateral Phase Detractor's Avatar
      Join Date
      Aug 23rd, 2005
      Location
      Columbus, Ohio
      Posts
      13,810
      Quote Originally Posted by ADDvanced View Post
      it better be aluminum. F150 is the only truck I'd remotely consider since I live in the salt belt. Everything rots out in less than 10 years.
      Two things:

      First, the F-series still uses a steel frame
      Second, I have some knowledge that all Ford products launched after ~2018 have improved corrosion protection compared with their earlier standard. This extends down to suppliers, so hopefully rusty subframes will be a thing of the past.

    5. #54
      Quote Originally Posted by Unilateral Phase Detractor View Post
      Two things:

      First, the F-series still uses a steel frame
      Second, I have some knowledge that all Ford products launched after ~2018 have improved corrosion protection compared with their earlier standard. This extends down to suppliers, so hopefully rusty subframes will be a thing of the past.
      Correct, it does! The undercoating on their newer vehicles looks stellar though, as you said. It will be nice though, having a truck for 10 years up north and still having wheel arches lol.

    6. #55
      Geriatric Member BRealistic's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 16th, 2005
      Location
      East-10EC
      Posts
      81,315
      "small"

      Vehicles owned (*=automatic):
      Chevy: 82 Cavalier Type 10, 94 Cavalier Coupe* | Chrysler: 96 Town & Country* | Ford: 73 F100, 88 F150, 18 F150* | Jeep: 78 CJ-5 | Mazdas: 83 GLC, 85 RX7 GS, 86 323, 90 323, 90 B2600i, 92 Miata, 97 Protege, 01 B2300, 01 B3000, 04 RX8 | Nissan: 90 240SX SE | Plymouth: 88 Caravan* | Pontiac: 84 Grand Prix* | Toyota: 84 Celica GTS, 02 Tundra*

    7. #56
      Member 2 doors's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 18th, 2003
      Location
      Baltimore, MD
      Posts
      5,770
      Quote Originally Posted by BRealistic View Post
      "small"

      Agreed. Are we sure that’s the sub-Ranger thing? It looks pretty big.

    8. #57
      Member
      Join Date
      May 15th, 2007
      Location
      Wilmington, DE
      Posts
      17,456
      Quote Originally Posted by 2 doors View Post
      Agreed. Are we sure that’s the sub-Ranger thing? It looks pretty big.
      This should theoretically be a Bronco Sport with a bed.
      I’m not sure if it’s significantly shorter than a Ranger, but it looks
      to have a lower ride height and overall height.

    9. #58
      Geriatric Member Air and water do mix's Avatar
      Join Date
      Aug 5th, 2004
      Location
      Southern Indiana
      Posts
      43,323
      Quote Originally Posted by whitejeep1989 View Post
      This should theoretically be a Bronco Sport with a bed.
      I’m not sure if it’s significantly shorter than a Ranger, but it looks
      to have a lower ride height and overall height.
      Let’s not forget that the next Ranger will likely grow, too.
      Quote Originally Posted by Boyz in da Park
      Proletariat, Bourgeoise - Everybody smellin' my potpourri...

    10. #59
      Member
      Join Date
      May 15th, 2007
      Location
      Wilmington, DE
      Posts
      17,456
      Honda deserves a lot of credit for “popularizing” the integrated bed/body pick-up truck in America.
      The Ridgeline is controversial and not a big seller, but I think it successfully tested the waters, for other manufacturers, for trucks of this configuration. We’ll soon have integrated body/bed trucks from Hummer, Tesla, Hyundai, Rivian, Bollinger, and this Ford Maverick. The FWD car based pick-up seems like the logical next evolution of the CUV genre, so it’s likely we’ll see many other brands field offerings in this body construction type, especially if the Maverick is successful.

    11. #60
      Member 2 doors's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 18th, 2003
      Location
      Baltimore, MD
      Posts
      5,770
      Quote Originally Posted by whitejeep1989 View Post
      Honda deserves a lot of credit for “popularizing” the integrated bed/body pick-up truck in America.
      The Ridgeline is controversial and not a big seller, but I think it successfully tested the waters, for other manufacturers, for trucks of this configuration. We’ll soon have integrated body/bed trucks from Hummer, Tesla, Hyundai, Rivian, Bollinger, and this Ford Maverick. The FWD car based pick-up seems like the logical next evolution of the CUV genre, so it’s likely we’ll see many other brands field offerings in this body construction type, especially if the Maverick is successful.
      Honda was not unique at the time it debuted. It’s contemporaries included the Baja, Avalanche, and Explorer SportTrac. Not to mention Hummer H2 SUT. SportTrack had a separate bed but it was still a pickup based off an SUV. Also I’d bet GM sold a lot more EscaLanches than Honda sold Ridgelines.

    12. #61
      Geriatric Member BRealistic's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 16th, 2005
      Location
      East-10EC
      Posts
      81,315
      Quote Originally Posted by 2 doors View Post
      Honda was not unique at the time it debuted. It’s contemporaries included the Baja, Avalanche, and Explorer SportTrac. Not to mention Hummer H2 SUT. SportTrack had a separate bed but it was still a pickup based off an SUV. Also I’d bet GM sold a lot more EscaLanches than Honda sold Ridgelines.
      The Ridgeline was the first serious contender based on a front wheel drive platform.
      That is true regardless of what else came before it.
      Vehicles owned (*=automatic):
      Chevy: 82 Cavalier Type 10, 94 Cavalier Coupe* | Chrysler: 96 Town & Country* | Ford: 73 F100, 88 F150, 18 F150* | Jeep: 78 CJ-5 | Mazdas: 83 GLC, 85 RX7 GS, 86 323, 90 323, 90 B2600i, 92 Miata, 97 Protege, 01 B2300, 01 B3000, 04 RX8 | Nissan: 90 240SX SE | Plymouth: 88 Caravan* | Pontiac: 84 Grand Prix* | Toyota: 84 Celica GTS, 02 Tundra*

    13. #62
      Member 2 doors's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 18th, 2003
      Location
      Baltimore, MD
      Posts
      5,770
      Quote Originally Posted by BRealistic View Post
      The Ridgeline was the first serious contender based on a front wheel drive platform.
      That is true regardless of what else came before it.
      I was referring to WJ’s statement about integrated cab and bed, not drivetrain layout.

      And calling the Ridgeline a “serious contender” is a huge stretch. It was barely an also-ran.

    14. #63
      Geriatric Member BRealistic's Avatar
      Join Date
      Dec 16th, 2005
      Location
      East-10EC
      Posts
      81,315
      Quote Originally Posted by 2 doors View Post
      I was referring to WJ’s statement about integrated cab and bed, not drivetrain layout.

      And calling the Ridgeline a “serious contender” is a huge stretch. It was barely an also-ran.
      Yeah, that is different.
      But also required if not a traditional front engine rear drive based BOF truck.
      As far as also ran.. more of a niche truck than an also ran.
      It's also the only truck still around (of those you listed) and selling decently now.
      Vehicles owned (*=automatic):
      Chevy: 82 Cavalier Type 10, 94 Cavalier Coupe* | Chrysler: 96 Town & Country* | Ford: 73 F100, 88 F150, 18 F150* | Jeep: 78 CJ-5 | Mazdas: 83 GLC, 85 RX7 GS, 86 323, 90 323, 90 B2600i, 92 Miata, 97 Protege, 01 B2300, 01 B3000, 04 RX8 | Nissan: 90 240SX SE | Plymouth: 88 Caravan* | Pontiac: 84 Grand Prix* | Toyota: 84 Celica GTS, 02 Tundra*

    15. #64
      Member 2 doors's Avatar
      Join Date
      Jun 18th, 2003
      Location
      Baltimore, MD
      Posts
      5,770
      Ironically, the second gen Ridgeline is selling well because it now looks more like a traditional truck. They even took pains to make the bed look separate. The other vehicles I mentioned served their purpose as a gateway for Americans to crew cab super short bed pickups. Ford and GM aren’t missing anything by no longer have the Avalanche and SportTrack in their lineups. The Baja was a niche.

      The conclusion we must then draw is that Americans hate the unibody pickup look.

    16. #65
      Senior Member bzcat's Avatar
      Join Date
      Nov 26th, 2001
      Location
      Los Angeles
      Posts
      24,659
      Quote Originally Posted by 2 doors View Post
      Agreed. Are we sure that’s the sub-Ranger thing? It looks pretty big.
      It has a lot of fake camo behind the rear axle to confuse you See the location of the muffler behind the rear axle to get a true sense of the length.

      It should be about the same size as LWB Transit Connect. Maybe a few inches longer.




    17. #66
      Member HotCarlWeathers's Avatar
      Join Date
      Aug 5th, 2013
      Location
      LMBRD IL
      Posts
      887
      Hmmmm...

      Remember what everyone thought was the next Ranger?



      I wonder...

      It's not the same truck—the leaked photo is definitely a midsize because the proportions are nearly dead-on with Ranger/Canyon/Colorado. But the styling cues of the leaked truck (headlamps, hood/fender intersection, semi-box flare fenders) appear like they are under the camo.
      Last edited by HotCarlWeathers; 08-03-2020 at 03:48 PM.
      I am not associated with Weber-Stephens wonderful American-made grilling products, nor with Guy Fieri or Martin's Famous Potato Rolls.

    Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123